Comments on: 8 Random Reasons You Shouldn’t Have Panicked Over Facebook’s New T.O.S. http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/ User Experience Design Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:59:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: think blog » Who Owns Your Social Health Data? http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-40061 think blog » Who Owns Your Social Health Data? Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:59:06 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-40061 [...] have used this blog to express my opinions about social media and privacy. Here, I declared, “your stuff isn’t worth anything.” My comment was a generalization [...] [...] have used this blog to express my opinions about social media and privacy. Here, I declared, “your stuff isn’t worth anything.” My comment was a generalization [...]

]]> By: think blog » Our Public Private Lives http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-34656 think blog » Our Public Private Lives Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:21:49 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-34656 [...] to see and despite threats to the contrary, nobody’s leaving because of privacy controls (especially Phil). We like the idea of privacy, but when push comes to shove, we’re pot-committed to our [...] [...] to see and despite threats to the contrary, nobody’s leaving because of privacy controls (especially Phil). We like the idea of privacy, but when push comes to shove, we’re pot-committed to our [...]

]]> By: think blog » Facebook’s ‘Evil Empire” One Year Later http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-17457 think blog » Facebook’s ‘Evil Empire” One Year Later Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:10:38 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-17457 [...] has been nearly a year since I penned my original rant about Doomsdayers and Nay-sayers terrified about Facebook wanting to own their content. As many [...] [...] has been nearly a year since I penned my original rant about Doomsdayers and Nay-sayers terrified about Facebook wanting to own their content. As many [...]

]]> By: phil http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-306 phil Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:59:21 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-306 Thanks, Croharamer. FB has a whole new set of things to worry about now... Huge backlash from major UI changes. Something we can all learn from, at least they seem to be listening to their users (after the fact)... Thanks, Croharamer. FB has a whole new set of things to worry about now… Huge backlash from major UI changes. Something we can all learn from, at least they seem to be listening to their users (after the fact)…

]]> By: Croharamer http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-277 Croharamer Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:08:16 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-277 Finally getting around to reading this... great post Phil! Finally getting around to reading this… great post Phil!

]]> By: phil http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-190 phil Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:11:50 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-190 I can appreciate concerns around privacy more than copyright. Our privacy levels on our social networking tools reflect our privacy comfort levels. Knowing that a site could bypass your choices is a bit ominous. I would still argue that your counter-example to Point(1) falls within the stated margin of error of my very scientific study. (heh heh) I can appreciate concerns around privacy more than copyright. Our privacy levels on our social networking tools reflect our privacy comfort levels. Knowing that a site could bypass your choices is a bit ominous.

I would still argue that your counter-example to Point(1) falls within the stated margin of error of my very scientific study. (heh heh)

]]> By: Diane http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-187 Diane Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:14:29 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-187 Here, here! Here, here!

]]> By: ks http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/2009/02/18/8-random-reasons-you-shouldnt-have-panicked-over-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-terms-of-service/#comment-186 ks Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:12:42 +0000 http://www.thinkbrownstone.com/blog/?p=288#comment-186 Interesting - although to me the issue is less about copyright ownership and more about privacy. Unlikely perhaps, but not impossible given how broadly the language is written. As a conceptual model whose UX framework is mercurial by nature, participation in any social network should not indefinitely disentitle a person's right to privacy. Point (1) - not necessarily: http://www.sweetney.com/sweetney/2007/12/all-i-want-for.html Interesting – although to me the issue is less about copyright ownership and more about privacy. Unlikely perhaps, but not impossible given how broadly the language is written. As a conceptual model whose UX framework is mercurial by nature, participation in any social network should not indefinitely disentitle a person’s right to privacy.

Point (1) – not necessarily: http://www.sweetney.com/sweetney/2007/12/all-i-want-for.html

]]>